Forde makes the point that the theologian of the cross does not try to see “through” or “around” the cross, but looks directly at it. What does he mean here in terms of our knowing God?

	

What is meant by the posteriora or “backside” of God? How is this an offense to the theologian of glory? 

	

Is it possible to see or understand God apart from the cross?

		

		

		

	

In what way does the theology of the cross, then, both destroy the theology of glory and reveal to us our true condition and position as human beings? 

		

		

		

	

In what way does the theologian of glory call what is good evil, and what is evil good?

	

How does the theologian of glory deal with the issue of suffering (either Christ’s or his or her own)?

		

		

		

		

	

In what way do even Christ’s sufferings get (wrongfully) turned into a theology of glory?

		

		

		

	

What kind of sufferings is Luther primarily concerned with here? Can physical suffering be in the same vein or bring a similar effect?

		

		

		

	

Why is it bad theology (glory theology) to try to justify God and thereby exonerate him of causing suffering? How does God powerfully use suffering for our good?

		

		

		

		

		

	

Pr. David A. Kind

	

February 26, 2003